|
According to some speed reading advocates, the World Championship Speed Reading Competition stresses reading comprehension as critical, and that the top contestants typically read around 1000 to 2000 words per minute with approximately 50% comprehension. The 10,000 WPM claimants have yet to reach this level. Much controversy is raised over this point. This is mainly because a reading comprehension level of 50% is deemed a failure by normal reading teachers, the public at large, and reading experts (Carver 1992). Speed reading advocates claim that it is a great success and even state that it is a demonstration of good comprehension (Buzan 2000). once claimed that he could read faster than he could turn pages.[citation needed] He may have been referring to simple skimming or scanning, although he is often used by speed reading proponents as an example of a natural speed reader, and to imply that they can teach a pupil to have the same abilities as Mill.U.S. President John F. Kennedy was a proponent of speed reading[1] and encouraged his staff to take lessons.President Jimmy Carter and his wife Rosalynn, both avid readers, enrolled in a speed-reading course (which their daughter Amy Carter attended briefly) at the White House,[2] along with several staff members.[3]A critical-skeptical discussion about the speed reading stories appeared in Slate. Among others, the article raises doubts about the origin of John F. Kennedy's allegedly amazing reading speed. Ronald Carver, a professor of education research and psychology, claims that the fastest college graduate readers can only read at most twice as fast as the slowest counterparts, namely about 600 words per minute.[2]I n defense of speed reading, and its related concept of speed learning, it should be understood that there are many different kinds of reading done for different purposes, for some of which very high speeds are attainable and desirable, and the mistake is to apply one method when a different method is better, for a particular kind of material or purpose. This also applies to methods of evaluating things like comprehension or retention, as there are many different kinds as well as degrees of comprehension or retention, for different purposes, and it is a mistake to apply one method of evaluation to kinds of reading for which that method is the wrong choice.Courtesy of Wikipedia (The Free Encyclopedia)
|